Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 25;2016:4717061. doi: 10.1155/2016/4717061

Table 2.

Airway insertion characteristics and performance of airway devices. Values are expressed as mean (SD) or numbers of patients (n) and percentages (%).

AMBU Aura-i
(n = 50)
LMA Supreme
(n = 50)
p value
Size of airway used: 3/4/5 11/39/0 7/43/0 0.436
Number of insertion attempts, n (%)
 1 43 (86.0%) 44 (88.0%) 0.591
 2 5 (10.0%) 6 (12.0%)
 3 2 (4.0%) 0
Reported ease of insertion, n (%)
 1 = easy 40 (80.0%) 42 (88.0%) 0.792
 2 = not so easy 6 (12.0%) 6 (12.0%)
 3 = difficult 4 (8.0%) 2 (4.0%)
 4 = very difficult 0 0
 5 = impossible 0 0
Time to successful airway insertion, s 18.2 (6.0) 17.3 (6.4) 0.900
Cuff volume at 60 cmH2O, mL 17.7 (3.5) 23.1 (4.4) <0.001
Manoeuvres to optimize ventilation
 None 37 (74.0%) 42 (84.0%) 0.784
 Adjusting head/neck position 4 (8.0%) 3 (6.0%)
 Changing depth of insertion 1 (2.0%) 0
 Applying jaw lift 1 (2.0%) 1 (2.0%)
 Reinserting the device 7 (4.0%) 4 (8.0%)
 Changing device size 0 0
Oropharyngeal leak pressure, cmH2O 28.8 (7.1) 27.2 (5.3) 0.240
Leak pressure <20 cmH2O, n (%) 8 (16.0%) 1 (2.0%) 0.031
Air leak into stomach at OLP
 Yes : No 4 (8.0%) : 46 (92.0%) 1 (2.0%) : 49 (98.0%) 0.362
Fiberoptic view
 0 = cannot function, no cord seen 0 NA
 1 = cords not seen but function adequate 5 (10.0%)
 2 = cords plus anterior epiglottis seen 34 (68.0%)
 3 = cords plus posterior epiglottis seen 10 (20.0%)
 4 = only cords seen 1 (2.0%)

Defined as time from insertion of airway device into patient's mouth to the first end-tidal carbon dioxide trace.