Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 8;7:1672. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01672

Table 2.

Stability of candidate reference gene expression under different experimental conditions.

Conditions CRGs geNorm
Normfider
BestKeeper
ΔCt
Stability Rank Stability Rank Stability Rank Stability Rank
Developmental 18S 1.032 6 0.154 1 0.876 6 1.658 4
Stage 28S 0.901 5 0.409 2 0.620 4 1.560 2
16S 0.668 1 0.710 3 0.338 1 1.459 1
EF1A 0.720 2 1.429 6 0.734 5 1.765 6
NADH 0.819 4 0.806 4 0.581 3 1.592 3
Actin 1.440 7 2.209 7 1.893 7 2.697 7
Tubulin 0.743 3 1.145 5 0.578 2 1.670 5
ArgK 1.997 8 3.815 8 3.041 8 3.947 8
Tissue 18S 0.350 1 0.175 1 0.372 3 1.043 4
28S 0.350 1 0.175 1 0.350 2 1.040 3
16S 0.423 2 0.210 2 0.157 1 0.996 1
EF1A 0.597 5 0.830 3 0.845 6 1.287 6
NADH 0.464 3 0.210 2 0.398 5 1.020 2
Actin 0.922 6 1.731 4 1.249 7 1.908 7
Tubulin 0.498 4 0.210 2 0.389 4 1.055 5
ArgK 1.134 7 1.793 5 1.292 8 1.978 8
dsRNA 18S 0.335 1 0.354 5 0.232 2 0.593 5
28S 0.524 7 0.609 8 0.406 8 0.761 8
16S 0.442 5 0.392 6 0.322 6 0.627 6
EF1A 0.393 3 0.200 1 0.258 4 0.563 2
NADH 0.478 6 0.462 7 0.382 7 0.684 7
Actin 0.374 2 0.289 3 0.200 1 0.558 1
Tubulin 0.335 1 0.287 2 0.259 5 0.576 3
ArgK 0.412 4 0.294 4 0.241 3 0.584 4

Candidate reference genes.