Table 3.
First ANC visit (n = 402) |
Second ANC visit (n = 398) |
Third ANC visit (n = 364) |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Active (n = 139) |
Non-active (n = 263) |
Difference: active - non-active | [p-Value] Ho: difference = 0 |
Active (n = 139) |
Non-active (n = 259) |
Difference: active - non-active | [p-Value] Ho: difference = 0 |
Active (n = 136) |
Non-active (n = 228) |
Difference: active - non-active | [p-Value] Ho: difference = 0 |
|
Facility characteristics | ||||||||||||
Visit was at a private ANC facility | 12.2% | 7.6% | 4.6% | [0.113] | 20.9% | 7.7% | 13.1% | [< 0.001]⁎⁎⁎ | 25.7% | 7.0% | 18.7% | [< 0.001]⁎⁎⁎ |
Visit was at a facility in own neighborhood | 23.0% | 40.7% | − 17.7% | [0.005]⁎⁎⁎ | 30% | 40.9% | − 10.7% | [0.101] | 30.1% | 40.8% | − 10.6% | [0.113] |
Visit was at a facility that offers delivery services | 52.6% | 62.7% | − 10.2% | [0.143] | 59.0% | 62.5% | − 3.6% | [0.620] | 64.9% | 62.7% | 2.2% | [0.687] |
Facility quality measures | ||||||||||||
Visit included (index out of 6): weight, blood pressure, fundal height, baby heart rate measured, urine sample taken, iron supplements | 4.812 | 5.153 | − 0.342 | [0.003]⁎⁎⁎ | 4.481 | 4.614 | − 0.132 | [0.261] | 4.585 | 4.586 | − 0.001 | [0.994] |
Respondent rated the overall quality of ANC at this visit “excellent” | 14.4% | 17.9% | − 3.5% | [0.295] | 25.9% | 15.1% | 10.8% | [0.010]⁎⁎⁎ | 25.7% | 13.7% | 12.1% | [0.012]⁎⁎ |
Respondent ranked facility used for this visit as highest quality | 5.7% | 17.1% | − 11.4% | [0.022]⁎⁎ | 11.4% | 16.4% | − 5.0% | [0.315] | 21.4% | 17.4% | 4.0% | [0.463] |
Patient delivered at ANC facility used for this visit (all) | 7.2% | 24.5% | − 17.3% | [0.001]⁎⁎⁎ | 10.8% | 24.1% | − 13.3% | [0.012]⁎⁎ | 18.4% | 23.7% | − 5.3% | [0.355] |
Patient delivered at ANC facility used for this visit (among those attending ANC at a facility that offers delivery) | 13.5% | 38.8% | − 25.3% | [< 0.001]⁎⁎⁎ | 18.3% | 38.3% | − 20.0% | [0.002]⁎⁎⁎ | 30.3% | 37.8% | − 7.4% | [0.361] |
“Active” is defined as those who attended more than one ANC facility. Study took place in Nairobi, Kenya in 2015.
A total of 10 values for the 6-point quality index are missing because at least 1 value within the index was missing.
p-Values are from ordinary least squares regressions with the dependent variable indicated in Column 1 regressed on a constant term and a binary variable for “Active” and test whether the coefficient on “Active” is significantly different from zero, separately for each visit number.
Robust standard errors are adjusted for clustering at the neighborhood level.
The variable for ANC facility utilized ranked as highest quality was only asked to respondents who received the full baseline and midline surveys (first visit: n = 291; second visit: n = 287; third visit: n = 263).
Missing values across all 3 visits per variable: quality index (9); excellent services (1); ANC facility offers delivery services (4); delivery facility at facility utilized for ANC (4); delivered at ANC facility that offers delivery (4).
p < 0.01.
p < 0.05.