Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jan 12;164(4):268–278. doi: 10.7326/M15-1789

Table 1.

Characteristics of Included Studies

Study USPSTF Quality Rating Design Country Patients/Exams Analyzed Follow-Up Period Population Characteristics
Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)
Density Assessment
Harvey, 2013 (20)
Good
Cohort United States 871,502 exams 435,751 women <36 moa Age: 58.8y (mean)
Redondo, 2012 (21)
Good
Stratified random sample Spain 100 exams
100 women
6 moa Age: 50–64y (range)
Spayne, 2012 (22)
Good
Cohort United States 11,755 women 3–24 moa Age: 66y (median)
Bernardi, 2012 (23)
Fair
Test set Italy 100 exams
100 women
NA Age: 43y (median)
Gard, 2015 (24)
Fair
Test set United States 341 women 6 moa NR

Hand-Held Ultrasound (HHUS)
Berg, 2012 (25)
Good
Test accuracy United States 3,414 exams
1,216 women
≥12 mo Age: 55.2y (mean)*
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: 0%
Family hx: NR
Corsetti, 2011 (26)
Good
Test accuracy Italy 7,224 exams
3,356 women
12 mo Age: 55% <50y
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: NR
Family hx: NR
Brancato, 2007 (27)
Fair
Cohort Italy 5,227 women NR Age: 68% 40–49y
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: NR
Family hx: NR
Girardi, 2013 (28)
Fair
Cohort United States 9,960 women 12 mo Age: 51.2y (mean)*
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: 9.8%
Family hx: NR
Hooley, 2012 (29)
Fair
Test accuracy United States 648 women ≥15 mo Age: 52y (mean)*
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: NR
Family hx: NR
Leong, 2012 (30)
Fair
Test accuracy Singapore 106 women 12–24 mo Age: 45.1y (mean)
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: 5%
Family hx: 20.9%
Parris, 2013 (31)
Fair
Cohort United States 5,519 women NR Age: 53.6y (mean)
Dense breasts: 89%
Personal hx: 6%
Family hx: 42%
Venturini, 2013 (32)
Fair
Cohort Italy 826 women NR Age: 100% <50y *
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: NR
Family hx: 24%*
Weigert, 2012 (33)
Fair
Cohort United States 8,647 exams
8,647 women
NR Age: 54.4y (mean)
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: NR
Family hx: NR
Youk, 2011 (34)
Fair
Test accuracy South Korea 446 exams 24 mo Age: 47.5y (mean)*
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: 0%
Family hx: NR

Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound (ABUS)
Brem, 2015 (35)
Fair
Cohort United States 15,318 12 mo Age: 53.3y (mean)
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: 3.6%
Family hx: 44.8%
Giuliano, 2013 (36)
Fair
Cohort United States 3,418 women 12 mo Age: NR
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: 0%
Family hx: 0%
Kelly, 2010 (37)
Fair
Test accuracy United States 6,425 exams
4,419 women
12 mo Age: 53y (mean)*
Dense breasts: 68%
Personal hx: 10%*
Family hx: : 30%

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Berg, 2012 (25)
Good
Test accuracy United States 334 exams 12 mo Age: 56.8y (mean)
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: NR
Family hx: NR
Kriege, 2006 (38)
Good
Test accuracy Netherlands 1,723 exams 12 mo Age: 40y (mean)*
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: NR
Family hx: 100%
Kuhl, 2014 (39)
Good
Test accuracy Germany 105 women 24 mo Age: 53.2y (mean)
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: NR
Family hx: NR

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)
Ciatto, 2013 (40)
Fair
Cohort Italy 1,215 women No follow-up except on biopsy results Age: 58y (median)*
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: NR
Family hx: NR
Haas, 2013 (41)
Fair
Cohort United States 4,794 exams No follow-up except on biopsy results Age: 33.3% <40y*
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: 5.5%*
Family hx: NR
McCarthy, 2014 (42)
Fair
Cohort United States 8,545 exams No follow-up except on biopsy results Age: 70% >50y
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: NR
Family hx: NR
Rose, 2013 (43)
Fair
Cohort United States 11,675 exams No follow-up except on biopsy results Age: 54.2y (mean)*
Dense breasts: 100%
Personal hx: NR
Family hx: NR
a

time between mammographic assessments

*

Data is reflective of the entire study population, not necessarily the subgroup with dense breasts

Abbreviations: Hx = history; mo=months; NA=not applicable; NR=not reported; y=years