Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jan 12;164(4):268–278. doi: 10.7326/M15-1789

Table 3.

Test Performance Characteristics for Supplemental Hand-Held Ultrasound (HHUS), Automated Whole Breast Ultrasound (ABUS), and MRI

Study Quality Sensitivity
(95% CI)
Specificity
(95% CI)
PPV
(95% CI)
NPV
(95% CI)
HHUS
Berg, 2012 (25)
Good
0.83
(0.59 to 0.96)
0.86
(0.85 to 0.88)
0.03
(0.02 to 0.05)
1.00
(1.00 to 1.00)
Corsetti, 2011 (26)
Good
0.80
(0.65 to 0.91)
0.95
(0.94 to 0.95)
0.07
(0.05 to 0.10)
1.00
(1.00 to 1.00)
Hooley, 2012 (29)
Fair
1.00
(0.29 to 1.00)
0.77
(0.73 to 0.80)
0.02
(0.01 to 0.06)
1.00
(0.99 to 1.00)
Leong, 2012 (30)
Fair
1.00
(0.16 to 1.00)
0.79
(0.70 to 0.86)
0.08
(0.02 to 0.26)
1.00
(0.96 to 1.00)
Youk, 2011 (34)
Fair
1.00
(0.72 to 1.00)
0.72
(0.67 to 0.76)
0.08
(0.05 to 0.14)
1.00
(0.99 to 1.00)

ABUS
Kelly, 2010 (37)
Fair
0.68
(0.50 to 0.83)
0.92
(0.91 to 0.92)
0.04
(0.03 to 0.06)
1.00
(1.00 to 1.00)

MRI
Berg, 2012 (25)
Good
1.00
(0.59 to 1.00)
0.78
(0.73 to 0.83)
0.09
(0.04 to 0.17)
1.00
(0.99 to 1.00)
Kriege, 2006 (38)
Good
0.75
(0.35 to 0.97)
0.89
(0.87 to 0.90)
0.03
(0.01 to 0.06)
1.00
(1.00 to 1.00)
Kuhl, 2014 (39)
Good
1.00
(0.29 to 1.00)
0.94
(0.88 to 0.98)
0.33
(0.12 to 0.66)
1.00
(0.96 to 1.00)

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; NPV=negative predictive value; PPV=Positive predictive value