Table 3.
Summary of multiple regression analysis for chocolate consumption with implicit preferences, depletion condition, and self-reported impulsivity as predictors.
| Chocolate consumption: Step1 |
Chocolate consumption: Step2 |
Chocolate consumption: Step3 |
||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predictor | b | SE | t | p | LLCI | ULCI | b | SE | t | p | LLCI | ULCI | b | SE | t | p | LLCI | ULCI |
| Implicit preferences (A) | 0.27 | 0.10 | 2.72 | 0.008 | 0.07 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 0.16 | 3.29 | 0.001 | 0.21 | 0.86 | 0.57 | 0.16 | 3.52 | 0.001 | 0.25 | 0.89 |
| Depletion condition (B) | -0.23 | 0.20 | -1.16 | 0.249 | -0.63 | 0.17 | -0.20 | 0.20 | -1.00 | 0.322 | -0.59 | 0.19 | -0.17 | 0.19 | -0.89 | 0.378 | -0.55 | 0.21 |
| Self-reported impulsivity (C) | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.99 | 0.233 | -0.10 | 0.30 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 1.25 | 0.217 | -0.10 | 0.45 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 1.12 | 0.264 | -0.12 | 0.43 |
| A ×B | -0.33 | 0.21 | -1.61 | 0.111 | -0.74 | 0.08 | -0.47 | 0.21 | -2.22 | 0.029 | -0.90 | -0.05 | ||||||
| A ×C | 0.15 | 0.10 | 1.51 | 0.135 | -0.05 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.14 | 2.55 | 0.012 | 0.08 | 0.63 | ||||||
| B ×C | -0.19 | 0.20 | -0.97 | 0.335 | -0.58 | 0.20 | -0.18 | 0.19 | -0.92 | 0.361 | -0.56 | 0.21 | ||||||
| A ×B ×C | -0.42 | 0.20 | -2.08 | 0.040 | -0.81 | -0.02 | ||||||||||||
| R2 | 0.114 | 0.184 | 0.223 | |||||||||||||||
| p (R2) | 0.011 | 0.006 | 0.002 | |||||||||||||||
| ΔR2 | 0.114 | 0.070 | 0.039 | |||||||||||||||
| p (ΔR2) | 0.011 | 0.063 | 0.040 | |||||||||||||||
N = 95. LLCI = 95% confidence interval lower limit; ULCI = 95% confidence interval upper limit.