Table 5.

Studies comparing CESM and Mammography: number of patients included, sensitivity and specificity given for CESM

Study	Number of patients (n)	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	Disease prevalence (%)
Lewin et al. [17]	26	100	86.7	50
Dromain et al. [2]	144	93	63	56.3
Dromain et al. [18]	110	91.9	46	56.7
Fallenberg et al. [19]	80	100	-	100
Jochelson et al. [3]	52	96	-	100
Fallenberg et al. [8]a	118	94.7*/95**	-	100
Lobbes et al. [5]	113	100	87.7	28
Luczyńska et al. [4]	152	100	41	76
Cheung et al. [20]	89	92.7	67.9	72
Luczyńska et al. [22]	118	100	Not provided	68.6
Cheung et al. [21]b	52	90.9	83.78	37.7

Disease prevalence based on number of lesions analysed in the included population is given, calculated from data given in study

Annotations: ^aSensitivity for CESM alone (*) and for CESM in combination with mammography (**). ^bPatients with microcalcifications only