Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 27;45(12):2387–2405. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0419-0

Table 5.

Comparative fit statistics from model-fitting procedure

ep −2LL df AIC ΔfLL Δdf p
Full psychometric model 66 105,881.4 46,204 13,473.4 NA NA NA
1. Drop scalar 60 105,920.3 46,210 13,500.3 38.91 6 0.00
2. Drop all NS paths 46 106,063.8 46,224 13,615.8 182.46 20 0.00

ep estimated parameters, LL log likelihood, AIC Akaike’s information criterion, df degrees of freedom; reduced models compared to full model