Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 18.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014:epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2728-4

Table 2.

Specificity and sensitivity values for each discriminant analysis and for the visual rating of AV-45 PET scans. The discriminant analyses were performed using the SUVr only (SUVr only), the histogram indexes (histogram only), and both histograms indexes and SUVr (All). Specificity, sensitivity, number of false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) are mentioned for each analysis. False positive refers to healthy controls classified as AD in the discriminant analyses or in the visual rating. False negative refers to AD patients classified as healthy controls in the discriminant analyses or in the visual ratings. The analysis leading to the best trade-off between the two measures is in bold.

Parameters Specificity Sensitivity FP FN
SUVr Grey SUVr only 82.4% 79.2% 3 5
White SUVr only 35.3% 54.2% 11 7
Grey and White SUVr only 29.4% 95.8% 12 1

Histogram indexes Grey histogram only 88.2% 91.7% 2 2
White histogram only 58.8% 87.5% 7 3
Grey and White histogram only 76.5% 83.3% 4 4

SUVr and histogram indexes Grey All 82.3% 87.5% 3 3
White All 58.8% 83.3% 7 4
Grey and White All 76.5% 83.3% 4 4

Visual Rating 88.2% 87.5% 2 3