Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 26;2016:4987437. doi: 10.1155/2016/4987437

Table 2.

Study variables versus predictor variable (augmentation technique).

GBR (n = 15) RBG (n = 13) P
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Patient number 13 11
Graft sites 15 13
Age, years 48.73 ± 10.96 48.92 ± 9.61 a0.962
Gender, F/M, n
 Male 5 (33.3) 6 (46.2) b0.761
 Female 10 (66.7) 7 (53.8)
Implant torque, sites
 Up 6 (40.0) 9 (69.2) b0.243
 Down 9 (60.0) 4 (30.8)
W0, mm 3.51 ± 0.70 3.42 ± 0.60 a0.720
W1, mm 8.93 ± 0.93 7.96 ± 0.71 a0.005∗∗
W1-W0, mm 5.42 ± 0.76 4.54 ± 0.59 a0.002∗∗

aIndependent samples t-test; bYates' continuity correction; ∗∗ P < 0.01.

GBR, guided bone regeneration; RBG, ramus block bone graft; W0, presurgical bone width; W1, bone width after healing; W1-W0, bone gain after healing.