Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 8;18:110. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0771-8

Table 5.

Associations of endpoints with SNP CYP19A1 rs10046 variants, overall and according to treatment assignments

CYP19A1: rs10046
Endpoint Cohort T/T vs T/C, C/C patients (events) Univariate model OR (95 % CI)a Univariate model Interaction P valueb Multivariable model OR (95 % CI)c
Hot flashes/sweating All patients 446 (172) vs 1519 (676) 0.78 (0.63, 0.97) 0.03 0.83 (0.66, 1.03)
Exemestane + OFS 227 (77) vs 759 (334) 0.65 (0.48, 0.89) 0.67 (0.49, 0.93)
Tamoxifen + OFS 219 (95) vs 760 (342) 0.94 (0.69, 1.27) 1.04 (0.75, 1.43)
Musculoskeletal events All patients 446 (110) vs 1520 (406) 0.90 (0.70, 1.15) 0.39 0.85 (0.66, 1.1)
Exemestane + OFS 227 (75) vs 759 (256) 0.97 (0.71, 1.33) 0.96 (0.69, 1.32)
Tamoxifen + OFS 219 (35) vs 761 (150) 0.77 (0.52, 1.16) 0.77 (0.51, 1.17)

aEstimates from univariate logistic regression model. b P value from test of rs10046 variants ((T/T) vs. T/C, C/C) by treatment interaction in logistic regression model (univariable) assessing association between the SNP variants and early-onset adverse events in the overall cohort. cAdjusted for baseline characteristics: age, menstrual status, body mass index, adjuvant chemotherapy use, treatment assignment (for “all patients” cohort), baseline hot flashes/sweating or baseline musculoskeletal symptoms (according to endpoint) and prior to or baseline concomitant medications use and use during relevant time period for the endpoint (yes or no). SNP single nucleotide polymorphism, OFS ovarian function suppression, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval