Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 8;16:660. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2009-x

Table 2.

Yield of smear microscopy versus Xpert among culture confirmed tuberculosis patients (n =96)

Xpert Sensitivity of SM % (95 %, CI) Incremental sensitivity of Xpert % (95 %,CI)
Positive Negative
Overall SM at all HF
n = 96
positive 46 3 51.0 (40.6–61.4) 32.3 (23.1–42.6)
negative 31 16
SM in all HIV positive
n = 28
positive 10 1 39.3 (21.5–59.4) 35.7 (18.6–55.9)
negative 10 7
SM in all HIV negative
n = 68
positive 36 2 55.9 (43.3–67.9) 30.9 (20.2–43.3)
negative 21 9
SM at all PL
n = 76
positive 34 3 48.7 (37.0–60.4) 32.9 (22.5–44.6)
negative 25 14
SM at all IL
n = 20
positive 12 0 60.0 (36.1–80.9) 30.0 (11.9–54.3)
negative 6 2
SM at ZN PL
n = 49
positive 24 3 55.1 (40.2–69.3) 32.7 (19.9–47.5)
negative 16 6
SM at LED-FM PL
n = 27
positive 10 0 37.0 (19.4–57.6) 33.3 (16.5–54.0)
negative 9 8
SM at ZN IL
n = 12
positive 7 0 58.3 (27.7–84.8) 25.0 (5.5–57.2)
negative 3 2
SM at LED-FM IL
n = 8
positive 5 0 62.5 (24.5–91.5) 37.5 (8.5–75.5)
negative 3 0

LED-FM light emitting diode fluorescence microscopy; ZN Ziehl Nelsen Xpert: Xpert MTB/RIF test; HIV human immunodeficiency virus; CI confidence interval; SM smear microscopy; IL intermediate laboratories; PL peripheral laboratories; SM smear microscopy