Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Sport Rehabil. 2010 Feb;19(1):41–56. doi: 10.1123/jsr.19.1.41

Table 2.

Landing Error Scoring System Phi Correlation and Percent Agreement Between Expert Rater and 3-Dimensional Motion-Analysis System

Item Correlation Agreement 3-Dimensional,
Mean ± SD
Phi
1: Ankle flexion at initial contact 89% (excellent) −10.13° ± 12.02° a
2: Knee flexion at initial contact p = .608 21% (poor) 18.31° ± 7.40° rφ = .118
3: Trunk flexion at initial contact p = .582 74% (moderate) −0.2° ± 5.9° rφ = −.130
4: Knee-flexion range of motion 84% (excellent) 65.31° ± 11.53° a
5: Trunk flexion at maximal knee flexion 95% (excellent) 6.14° ± 5.14° a
6: Initial foot contact 42% (poor) 7-ms difference a
7: Foot position at initial contact: toes >30° external rotation p = .310 85% (excellent) 22.69 ± 14.88 rφ = −.233
8: Foot position at initial contact: toes >30° internal rotation 100% (excellent) 22.69 ± 14.88 a
9: Stance width < shoulder width 74% (moderate) 6 ± 3.6 cm a
10: Stance width > shoulder width 100% (excellent) 6 ± 3.6 cm a
11: Knee valgus at initial contact p = .414 68% (moderate) −0.67° ± 3.77° rφ = –.188
12: Lateral trunk flexion at initial contact 10% (poor) 1.0 ± 0.8 cm a
13: Knee-valgus range of motion p = .047* 74% (moderate) 0.94° ± 9.31° rφ = .456
a

Could not be calculated because of lack of variance in either 3-dimensional instrument or rater score.

*

Significant correlation, P < .05.