Table 3.
High diabetes risk | ||
---|---|---|
AOR | 95 % CI | |
Individual-level predictors | ||
Age (years)† | 1·85 | 1·64, 2·10 |
Female gender‡ | 0·87 | 0·68, 1·12 |
BMI (kg/m2)† | 1·58 | 1·44, 1·72 |
SBP (mmHg)† | 1·29 | 1·17, 1·42 |
Non-HDL-C (mmol/l)† | 1·24 | 1·13, 1·37 |
Zip-code-level predictors | ||
Population below FPL (%)†,§ | 1·25 | 1·14, 1·38 |
Walk Score® † | 1·19 | 1·04, 1·37 |
Supermarket density (stores per square mile (2·59km2))† | 0·84 | 0·71, 0·99 |
Model summary | ||
Nagelkerke R 2 | 0·14 | |
C statistic | 0·80 | |
95 % CI | 0·78, 0·82 | |
Hosmer and Lemeshow test | ||
χ 2 | 10·44 | |
df | 8 | |
P value | 0·24 |
AOR, adjusted odds ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; Non-HDL-C, non-HDL cholesterol; FPL, federal poverty level.
All continuous explanatory variables in the model are standardized such that the odds ratio represents the effect of a 1 sd change in the independent variable on the likelihood of high diabetes risk.
The gender variable compares females with the reference category (males).
The zip-code-level race variable (percentage African American) was excluded from the multivariable analysis because of significant collinearity with percentage below the FPL.