Table 6.
Summary of Multiple Regression Analyses Regressing Negative Cognitive-Emotional Factors on Marianismo Gender Role Beliefs
| Predictor | Depression | Anxiety | Anger | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | SE | Δ R2 | β | SE | Δ R2 | β | SE | Δ R2 | ||
| Model 1 | Control variables | 7.16% | 9.05% | 5.96% | ||||||
| Model 2 | Marianismo: | 0.65% | 1.36% | 1.35% | ||||||
| Family pillar | .16* | .07 | .09 | .05 | .16* | .06 | ||||
| Virtuous and chaste | −.17*** | .05 | −.15*** | .04 | −.16*** | .05 | ||||
| Subordinate to others | .09 | .07 | .13 | .07 | .12 | .08 | ||||
| Self-silencing | .07 | .06 | .08 | .06 | −.06 | .06 | ||||
| Spiritual pillar | .02 | .08 | .19*** | .07 | .28*** | 08 | ||||
| Total R2 | 7.81% | 10.41% | 7.31% | |||||||
| Predictor | Anger Temperament | Anger Reaction | Cynical Hostility | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | SE | Δ R2 | β | SE | Δ R2 | β | SE | Δ R2 | ||
| Model 1 | Control variables | 6.05% | 4.32% | 8.85% | ||||||
| Model 2 | Marianismo: | 0.97% | 1.14% | 3.15% | ||||||
| Family pillar | .04 | .03 | .09** | .03 | .09** | .03 | ||||
| Virtuous and chaste | −.08*** | .02 | −.04 | .03 | −.03 | .03 | ||||
| Subordinate to others | .05 | .03 | .04 | .04 | .12*** | .04 | ||||
| Self-silencing | −.01 | .03 | −.03 | .03 | .09** | .03 | ||||
| Spiritual pillar | .12** | .04 | .12** | .04 | .14** | .05 | ||||
| Total R2 | 7.02% | 5.46% | 12.00% | |||||||
Note. Control variables included age, marital status, income, education, employment status, gender, language use acculturation, social ethnic relations acculturation, field site, and Hispanic background group. Model 2 adjusted for Model 1 control variables plus marianismo gender roles subscales. All subscales were entered simultaneously.
*
p < .05.
**
p < .01.
***
p < .001.