Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 4;6(11):e00542. doi: 10.1002/brb3.542

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Results of the classification of the position of facial stimuli based on four quadrant position classifiers generated from nonfacial stimuli. (A) The relative weighting of voxels with different polar angle lag values to each of the four position classifiers, with white showing a strong positive weight, light gray a weak positive weight, and black a weak negative weight. The position of the four annuli within the figure indicates the position they respond to the most. When applied to the activation vector across voxels to each trial, the classifier with the greatest positive value was taken as the position output for that trial. (B) and (C) Distribution of outputs of the position classifiers for the occipital face area (OFA) and fusiform face area (FFA), respectively, for correct and incorrect trials. I and S refer to the inferior and superior visual field, respectively, and L and R refer to the left and right visual field, respectively. (error bars = 95% c.i.) (*< .05, **< .01, ***< .001)