Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 24;57(4):481–490. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12465

Table 2.

Associations between depressive profiles and risk factors

A: School sample (N = 1504) Moderatedepressive (9%) B (SE) Depressive (3%) B (SE) Comorbid (4%) B (SE) Depressive comorbid (1%) B (SE)
Gender proportions 57% female 61% female 47% female 43% female
Gendera .480 (.220)* .708 (.338)* .024 (.349) .225 (.541)
Attainment .405 (.130)** .090 (.222) .903 (.209)*** .228 (.363)
IQb .023 (.013) .012 (.024) .081 (.022)*** .041 (.026)
Maternal hostility .215 (.024)*** .309 (.035)*** .216 (.034)*** .483 (.061)***
B: Twin sample (N = 2001) Moderate depressive (16%)
B (SE)
Depressive (4%)
B (SE)
Comorbid (2%)
B (SE)
High depressive (1%)
B (SE)
Gender proportions 62% female 53% female 49% female 68% female
Gendera .260 (.148) .102 (.247) .268 (.327) .517 (.459)
Age (months) .002 (.003) .004 (.004) .013 (.007) .016 (.008)*

The normative profile is the reference group, analyses included all 8 profiles.

a

0 = boys 1 = girls.

b

IQ was included in a separate model (N = 1016) to attainment as these were highly correlated (= .831) results for gender and maternal hostility revealed the same pattern of results in both models, with the exception that gender was no longer significantly associated with the moderate‐depressive profile for the IQ model, although the estimates were similar (B = .449, SE = .279; result available from the first author).

< .1; *< .05; ** < .01; *** < .001.