Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 5;3(11):1600018. doi: 10.1002/advs.201600018

Table 1.

Performance comparison of our Gr/MoSe2/Si heterojunction‐based photodetector with other photodetectors in literatures

Devices Wavelength [nm] Detectivity [Jones] Pulsed light frequency [Hz] Rise time [μs] Fall time [μs] References
Gr/MoSe2/Si heterojunction 365–1310 7.13 × 1010 106 0.27 0.35 This work
Monolayer MoSe2 phototransistor 532, 650 _ _ 2.5 × 104 2.5 × 104 43
MoSe2 nanosheets photoconductor 650 _ _ 2.9 × 106 4.6 × 106 44
Monolayer MoSe2 photoconductor 532 _ _ 6 × 104 6 × 104 45
MoSe2 nanostructure photoconductor 650 _ _ 7.9 × 106 9.8 × 106 51
Multilayer MoSe2 phototransistor 532 _ _ 1.5 × 104 3 × 104 52
Multilayer MoS2 phototransistor 532 ≈1010 _ 70 110 53
Gr/Si heterojunction 400‐900 2.1 × 108 20 1.2 × 103 3 × 103 54