Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 9.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Dec;90(12):2125–2130. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.022

Table 3.

Average Scores on Secondary Outcome Measures at Baseline and Discharge, and Comparison of Score Differences Between Baseline and Discharge From Rehabilitation for the BWSTT and Control Groups

Outcome Values at Baseline
Values at Discharge
Values at Follow-up
Score Differences Between Baseline and Discharge
Score Differences Between Baseline and Follow-up
BWSTT (n=14) Control (n=7) BWSTT (n=12) Control (n=5) BWSTT (n=10) Control (n=4) Estimate (SE) 95% CI P Estimate (SE) 95% CI P
TUG (s) 73.5±29.1* 45.6±10.3 25.2±7.0 20.7±5.0 18.0±6.8 12.8±0.9 −26.3 (23.4) (−72.1, 19.6) .32 −13.1 (16.7) (−45.8, 19.7) .45
2MWT (m) 18.7±18.9 23.6±15.3 70.6±17.3* 79.4±17.9 87.8±20.6§ 51.2±59.4 −4.52 (10.0) (−24.2, 15.1) .66 38.1 (22.3) (−5.7, 81.8) .10
LEFS (score/80)|| 16.6±8.0 25.7±16.5 35.3±7.5 46.4±7.2 45.4±9.4 48.0±4.4 0.08 (4.1) (−8.0, 8.1) .98 5.8 (5.4) (−4.8, 16.5) .30
FSES (score/40) 22.4±9.2 22.0±8.2 17.7±6.6 12.8±4.4 14.4±2.6 15.3±5.2 2.8 (3.3) (−3.6, 9.2) .40 −2.1 (4.7) (−11.4, 7.1) .66

NOTE. Values are mean ±SD or as otherwise indicated. Also, the n for each cell represents the value indicated in the column heading unless otherwise indicated. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FSES, Falls Self-Efficacy Scale.

*

Valid n=8.

Valid n =4.

Valid n=11.

§

Valid n=9.

||

A higher score indicates greater lower extremity function.

A higher score indicates poorer falls self-efficacy.