Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 27;2016:5135176. doi: 10.1155/2016/5135176

Table 5.

Psychological positive health in women and men, separated by the presence or absence of fibromyalgia.

Fibromyalgia P Effect size Nonfibromyalgia P Effect size P interaction
Women (n = 354) Men (n = 21) Women (n = 219) Men (n = 50)
Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean (SE) Mean (SE)
LOTR
 Optimism (0–12) 6.9 (0.1) 6.2 (0.6) 0.240 0.27 8.3 (0.2) 8.5 (0.4) 0.768 0.05 0.186
 Pessimism (0–12) 6.6 (0.1) 5.8 (0.6) 0.199 0.29 7.5 (0.2) 7.4 (0.4) 0.770 0.05 0.404
PANAS
 Positive affect (10–50) 22.7 (0.4) 21.8 (1.5) 0.560 0.13 30.9 (0.6) 30.3 (1.2) 0.648 0.07 0.898
 Negative affect (10–50) 24.6 (0.5) 27.5 (1.9) 0.139 0.34 17.8 (0.4) 16.3 (0.9) 0.131 0.24 0.049
SWLS
 Satisfaction with life (5–25) 14.0 (0.2) 13.1 (1.0) 0.402 0.19 17.9 (0.3) 17.6 (0.6) 0.615 0.08 0.536
TMMS
 Emotional repair (8–40) 22.9 (0.4) 20.3 (1.6) 0.130 0.34 26.9 (0.5) 27.0 (1.1) 0.954 0.01 0.206

LOT-R, Life Orientation Test Revised. PANAS, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. SE, standard error. SWLS, Satisfaction with Life Scale. TMMS, Trait Metamood Scale. Differences between women and men groups were performed using linear regression with marital status and current occupational status entered as covariates in fibromyalgia, whereas marital status, current occupational status, and body mass index were used in nonfibromyalgia participants. Effect size statistics are expressed as Cohen's d.