Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 Jun 6;30(5):566–577. doi: 10.1037/adb0000184

Table 5.

Odds ratios and significance values for univariate prediction of latent classes (pairwise comparisons).

Light family vs
Heavya
Light family vs
Sneaky
Light family vs
Light friend
Sneaky vs
Heavy
Sneaky vs
Light friend
Heavy vs Light
friend
Gender (male) 9.68* 1.98 7.88+ 4.85+ 3.90 0.79

Age 0.16** 0.43* 0.44+ 0.36+ 1.001 02.78**
Type of alcohol
 Beer 5.22 6.27 14.98+ 0.84 2.34 2.78
 Wine 8.76+ 3.32 35.14** 2.54 10.48+ 4.12
 Liquor 0.05** 0.18+ 0.78 0.30 4.44+ 14.73**
Injunctive peer norms 0.07** 0.27+ 0.09* 0.26** 0.31+ 1.22
Descriptive peer norms 0.02** 0.27 0.04* 0.09** 0.13* 1.47
Parent AUDIT 0.91 1.20 1.02 0.76* 0.85 1.13
Parent drinking problem 0.08+ 0.30 0.04* 0.27 0.13+ 0.47
Parental monitoring 9.12* 6.04+ 9.20+ 1.49 1.48 1.02
Parent reaction to drinking 4.39* 2.22 4.13* 1.99 1.88 0.94
Alcohol availability 0.08* 0.20 0.26 0.41 1.31 3.25

Note.

+

p < .10,

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

*** p < .001

N ranged from 337 to 344, with the exception of parent-reported AUDIT (N=315).

a

An odds ratio greater than one indicates that the first group was significantly higher than the second group; an odds ratio less than one indicates that the second group was significantly higher than the first group