Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 21;31(4):479–491. doi: 10.1007/s10869-015-9428-3

Table 3.

Structural models of the direct relations between the predictors (Despotic leadership and Laissez-Faire leadership), mediators (Job Insecurity and Conspiracy Beliefs), and criteria (Organizational Commitment and Turnover Intentions)

Structural model with all relations Final structural model
B SE β p B SE β p
Despotic leadership → job insecurity .23 .09 .12 .01 .25 .09 .24 <.01
Despotic leadership → conspiracy beliefs .44 .07 .56 <.01 .43 .07 .54 <.01
Despotic leadership → Org. commitment .02 .10 .03 .82
Despotic leadership → turnover intentions .12 .13 .10 .37
Laissez-faire → job insecurity .86 .12 .68 <.01 .84 .12 .68 <.01
Laissez-faire → conspiracy beliefs −.05 .14 −.06 .70
Laissez-faire → org. commitment .25 .17 .28 .15 .20 .09 .23 .03
Laissez-faire → turnover intentions .18 .23 .12 .44
Job insecurity → conspiracy Beliefs .23 .11 .30 .05 .20 .07 .26 <.01
Job insecurity → org. commitment −.06 .15 −.09 .66
Job insecurity → turnover intentions .49 .19 .41 .01 .76 .08 .62 <.01
Conspiracy beliefs → org. commitment −.40 .12 −.43 <.01 −.41 .10 −.44 <.01
Conspiracy beliefs → turnover intentions .07 .16 .04 .68
Org. commitment → turnover intentions −.68 .12 −.40 <.01 −.71 .11 −.42 <.01