Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 9;82(23):6810–6818. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02500-16

TABLE 1.

Antibiotic susceptibility of F420-deficient mycobacteriaa

Substrate MIC (μg · ml−1)
MIC ratio (WT/mutant)b
WT fgd::kan fbiC::kan
Quinone analogues
    Menadione 32 2 2 16
    1,4-Naphthoquinone 32 1 1 32
    1,2-Naphthoquinone 32 2 2 16
Furanocoumarins and aminocoumarins
    Methoxsalen 64 1 1 64
    Angelicin 128 1 1 128
    Imperatorin 32 0.5 0.5 64
    Novobiocin 0.5 0.5 0.5 1
Arylmethane dyes
    Malachite green 64 1 0.5 64, 128
    Crystal violet 16 1 0.5 16, 32
    Phenol red 8 0.5 0.5 16
    Azure B 16 2 2 8
Quinolones and fluoroquinolones
    Oxolinic acid 16 0.125 0.125 128
    Nalidixic acid 128 1 1 128
    Ciprofloxacin 0.25 3.1 × 10−2 7.8 × 10−3 8
    Moxifloxacin 6.3 × 10−2 6.3 × 10−2 3.1 × 10−2 1, 2
Clinical antimycobacterials
    Rifampin 4 2 2 2
    Ethambutol 0.5 0.13 0.13 4
    Isoniazid 32 16 16 2
    Pyrazinamide 512 256 256 2
    Clofazimine 8 4 4 2
a

MICs are shown for exponential-phase wild-type (WT), fgd mutant, and fbiC mutant cultures. MICs were determined by serially diluting antibiotic stocks in 96-well plates and measuring growth inhibition by the OD600. Five first-line antimycobacterials (rifampin, ethambutol, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and clofazimine) and 1 second-line antimycobacterial (moxifloxacin) were tested.

b

Cells with two values are the ratios for the fgd::kan mutant and fbiC::kan mutant, respectively.