Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 10;16:351. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1142-2

Table 2.

Mode of delivery, maternal outcome, and appearance of stillborn babies

Case-control study
BW ≥2000 g
Cases
Pre-hosp. Stillbirths
Cases
Intra-hosp. Stillbirths
Controls
Apgar 710
N (%)
Mode of delivery
Of all women in the study: (n = 67) (n = 72) (n = 249)
  Spontaneous vaginal 45 (67.2 %) 46 (63.9 %) 213 (85.5 %)
  Vaginal breech 3 (4.5 %) 5 (6.9 %) 5 (2.0 %)
  Vacuum extraction 1 (1.5 %) 0 (0.0 %) 0 (0.0 %)
  Caesarean sectiona, b 15 (22.4 %) 20 (27.8 %) 26 (10.4 %)
  Mode of delivery unknown 3 (4.5 %) 1 (1.4 %) 5 (2.0 %)
Maternal outcome
Of all women in the study: (n = 67) (n = 72) (n = 249)
  Maternal deaths 2 (3.0 %) 1 (1.4 %) 0 (0.0 %)
  Post partum haemorrhagec 7 (10.4 %) 10 (13.9 %) 14 (5.6 %)
  Episiotomy/spontaneous tearsd, e 6 (9.0 %) 19 (26.4 %) 79 (31.7 %)
Of vaginal deliveries: (n = 49) (n = 51) (n = 218)
  Prolonged admission, ≥1 dayf 9 (18.4 %) 0 (0.0 %) 3 (1.4 %)
Of caesarean sections: (n = 15) (n = 20) (n = 26)
  Prolonged admission, ≥5 days 1 (6.7 %) 3 (15.0 %) 2 (7.7 %)
‘Fresh’ versus ‘macerated’ stillbirths
Of all women in the study: (n = 67) (n = 72) (n = 249)
  Classification not recorded 36 (53.7 %) 41 (56.9 %) NA

BW birthweight, CI confidence interval, NA not applicable; OR, odds ratio

aOverall, 9/35 (26 %) of the caesarean sections with stillbirth were done prior to active labour, and 10/35 (29 %) in second stage. Among controls, this was the case for 13/26 (50 %) and 0/26 (0 %), respectively

bDifference between stillbirths and controls: OR 2.94, 95 % CI 1.68–5.14

cDifference between stillbirths and controls: OR 2.34, 95 % CI 1.12–4.90

dInformation was insufficient to distinguish between spontaneous vaginal tears and episiotomies

eDifference between pre-hospital stillbirths and controls: OR 0.21, 95 % CI 0.09–0.51

fDifference between pre-hospital stillbirths and controls: OR 16.13, 95 % CI 4.18–62.17