Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 10;58:77. doi: 10.1186/s13028-016-0261-0

Table 2.

Distribution and univariable analysis of management routines in 42 herds experiencing neonatal porcine diarrhoea (NPD herds) and 56 herds with no or occasional cases (Non-NPD herds)

Variablea NPD herds
n (%)
Non-NPD herds
n (%)
P valueb
Manual cleaning of the farrowing unit (times/day) c 0.12d
0–1 27 (64) 26 (46)
2–3 15 (36) 30 (58)
Washing of the farrowing unit between batches <0.01e
Always 35 (83) 32 (57)
During summer 5 (12) 9 (16)
No 2 (5) 15 (27)
Disinfection of the farrowing unit between batches 0.07d
Yes 28 (67) 26 (46)
No 14 (33) 30 (54)
Maternal vaccination against NPD 0.02e
Yes 40 (95) 43 (83)
No 2 (5) 13 (25)
Employment of nurse sows 0.01d
Yes 24 (57) 17 (30)
No 18 (43) 39 (70)
Monitoring of farrowings 0.17e
Only if indicated 3 (7) 11 (20)
During daytime 35 (83) 38 (68)
During day and night 4 (10) 7 (13)
Efforts made to save weak-born piglets <0.01d
None/some 18 (43) 43 (77)
Moderate/ambitious 24 (57) 13 (23)
Type of supplemental heating in the creep area 0.19e
Heat lamp 11 (26) 24 (43)
Floor heating 4 (10) 6 (10)
Lamp and floor heating 27 (64) 25 (45)
Other 0 (0) 1 (2)

aRespondents were requested to base their answers on an average farrowing batch during the last 12 months

bP value of the entire variable

cFirst week after farrowing

dχ2-test

eFisher’s exact test