Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 8;19(1):21106. doi: 10.7448/IAS.19.1.21106

Table 5.

Quality assessment of studies included in the meta-analysis (Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for cohort studies)

Selection Comparability Outcome Total Rating



Author, year [Reference] Representativeness of the exposed cohort Selection of the non-exposed cohort Ascertainment of exposure Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study Comparability of cohorts on basis of design or analysis Assessment of outcome Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts Number of stars (max. 9) 7–9=high; 4–6=moderate; 1–3=low
Africa
 Abaasa, 2008 [20] * * * * * * * 7 High
 Alemu, 2010 [23] * * * * * * 6 Moderate
 Bastard, 2011 [26] * * * * * * * * 8 High
 Biadgilign, 2012 [27] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Bisson, 2008 [29] * * * * * * * * 8 High
 Boyles, 2011 [30] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Brinkhof, 2009 [32] * * * * * * * 7 High
 Chalamilla, 2012 [33] * * * * ** * * 8 High
 Chen, 2008 [34] * * * * ** * * 8 High
 Chi, 2009 [35] * * * * ** * * 8 High
 Chi, 2010 [36] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Chu, 2010 [37] * * * * * * * * 8 High
 Cornell, 2012 [39] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 De Beaudrap, 2008 [41] * * * * * * * 7 High
 De Luca, 2012 [42] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Desilva, 2009 [44] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Fatti, 2010 [47] * * * * * * * * 8 High
 Ford, 2010 [48] * * * * * * * * 8 High
 Geng, 2010a [51] * * * * * * * * 8 High
 Greig, 2012 [53] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Hawkins, 2011 [54] * * * * ** * * 8 High
 Hermans, 2012 [55] * * * * * * * * 8 High
 Hoffman, 2011 [57] * * * * ** * * 8 High
 Johannessen, 2008 [58] * * * * * * * * 8 High
 Kassa, 2012 [60] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Kouanda, 2012 [63] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 MacPherson, 2009 [65] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Mageda, 2012 [66] * * * * ** * * 8 High
 Maman, 2012b [68] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Maman, 2012c [69] * * * * ** * * 8 High
 Mutevedzi, 2011 [78] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Negin, 2011 [80] * * * * * * * 7 High
 Odafe, 2012 [82] * * * * * * 6 Moderate
 Ojikutu, 2008 [83] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Palombi, 2009 [84] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Peterson, 2011 [87] * * * * * * * * 8 High
 Poka-Mayap, 2013 [88] * * * * ** * * 8 High
 Russell, 2010 [90] * * * * * * * * 8 High
 Sieleunou, 2009 [92] * * * * * * * * 8 High
 Somi, 2012 [94] * * * * ** * * 8 High
 Toure, 2008 [98] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Wandeler, 2012 [100] * * * * * * * 7 High
 Wubshet, 2012 [102] * * * * * * * 7 High
Central Europe/East Europe
 Tsertsvadze, 2011 [14] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
Latin America
 Wolff, 2010 [104] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
Asia
 Alvarez-Uria, 2013 [105] * * * * ** * * 8 High
 Argemi, 2012 [106] * * * * * * * 7 High
 Bastard, 2013 [107] * * * * * * * * 8 High
 Chen, 2013 [109] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Fregonese, 2012 [111] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Rai, 2013 [114] * * * * ** * * * 9 High
 Tran, 2013, Vietnam [118] * * * * ** * * 8 High
 Van Griensven, 2011 [119] * * * * * * * * 8 High
 Zhang, 2009 [121] * * * * * * * * 8 High

*The study adequately met the criteria; 0–3 stars=low-quality rating, 4–6 moderate quality rating and 7–9 high-quality rating.