Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 14;12(5):2873–2880. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3701

Table IV.

Likelihood of developing dyslipidemia in different genders by the logistic regression model.

Gender TC ≥5.18 mmol/l OR (95% CI) TG ≥1.7 mmol/l OR (95% CI) LDL-C ≥3.37 mmol/l OR (95% CI) HDL-C <1.04 mmol/l OR (95% CI)
Male (n=178)
  TSH subgroup 2 3.30 (0.78–13.92) 1.35 (0.34–5.30) 2.63 (0.67–10.29) 0.72 (0.13–3.91)
  TSH subgroup 3 9.40a (4.17–21.15) 1.83 (0.92–3.63) 9.60a (4.53–20.35) 0.50 (0.21–1.19)
Female (n=526)
  TSH subgroup 2 4.60a (2.05–10.30) 1.85 (0.88–3.88) 2.52a (1.27–4.97) 1.08 (0.23–5.13)
  TSH subgroup 3 13.12a (7.74–22.25) 5.50a (3.50–8.65) 12.98a (8.11–20.78) 0.68 (0.25–1.83)

TSH was designated as a categorical variable; age, body mass index, uric acid and fasting glucose were taken as covariates; TSH subgroup 2 (5–30 µIU/ml) and TSH subgroup 3 (>30 µIU/ml) were compared with TSH subgroup 1 (normal level). TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a

P<0.01.