Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimers Dement. 2016 Mar 24;12(7):776–785. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.01.011

Table 2.

Multi domain descriptive system for AD, and participants (NACC-UDS, n = 3009) by location

Domain severity level
State severity label Number at baseline Number at 12-month follow-up
Cognition Behavior Function State name
1 1 1 111 Mild* 455 226
1 1 2 112 Mild* 581 444
1 1 3 113 Moderate 63 79
1 2 1 121 Mild* 101 44
1 2 2 122 Mild* 354 249
1 2 3 123 Moderate 56 82
1 3 1 131 Moderate 29 12
1 3 2 132 Moderate 97 84
1 3 3 133 Moderate 33 46
2 1 1 211 Moderate* 77 54
2 1 2 212 Moderate* 361 386
2 1 3 213 Moderate 159 245
2 2 1 221 Moderate* 20 14
2 2 2 222 Moderate* 191 207
2 2 3 223 Moderate 158 253
2 3 1 231 Moderate 5 5
2 3 2 232 Moderate 59 73
2 3 3 233 Severe 76 161
3 1 2 312 Severe 9 28
3 1 3 313 Severe 34 100
3 2 2 322 Severe 6 10
3 2 3 323 Severe 57 106
3 3 2 332 Severe 2 4
3 3 3 333 Severe 26 96
3 1 1 311 Severe 0 1
3 2 1 321 Severe 0 0
3 3 1 331 Severe 0 0

Columns 1–3: 1 refers to mild in cognition, no problem/mild in behavior, no problem in function; 2 refers to moderate in cognition, behavior and function; 3 refers to severe in cognition, behavior and function.

*

These eight health states are used to define a cohort of people with mild to moderate AD, i.e., 21% in state 111, 27% in state 112, and so on (see Table 5; showing 69.5% mild, 30.5% moderate AD). The defined cohort is used to demonstrate the application of the modeling framework in a health policy context.