Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2016 Sep 27;17(1):69–85. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.073

Figure 6.

Figure 6

SIRT3 and SIRT5 are essential for photoreceptor survival. (A) Individual SIRT3 and SIRT5 knockdown but not SIRT4 knockdown caused significant loss of reductive capacity relative to negative control (NC); combined SIRT3/SIRT5 knockdown caused significantly more loss of reductive capacity than individual knockdowns, which could not be rescued with NMN (n=6/group from representative experiment; 1-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test). (B) Individual SIRT3 and SIRT5 knockdown but not SIRT4 knockdown caused significant cell death relative to negative control (NC); combined SIRT3/SIRT5 knockdown caused significantly more cell death than individual knockdowns, which could not be rescued with NMN (n=18/group from three independent experiments; 1-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test). (C) Individual and combined SIRT3/SIRT5 knockdowns recapitulated NAD-IDH dysfunction compared to negative control (NC; n=3/group from three independent experiments; 1-way ANOVA with Tukey post- hoc test). (D–F) Mice lacking SIRT3 and SIRT5 (SIRT3KOSIRT5KO) were significantly more vulnerable to light-induced degeneration (LID) compared to SIRT3hetSIRT5het mice, while SIRT3KOSIRT5het and SIRT3hetSIRT5KO mice exhibited intermediate vulnerability to LID (n=5–7 mice/group; 2-way mixed ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc test). Graphs depict mean + S.E.M. (A–C) or mean ± S.E.M. (D–F) (* p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001; # p < .0001; ^ p < .05 relative to both SIRT3KD and SIRT5KD; red: SIRT3hetSIRT5het versus SIRT3KOSIRT5KO; brown: SIRT3KOSIRT5het versus SIRT3KOSIRT5KO; grey: SIRT3hetSIRT5KO versus SIRT3KOSIRT5KO).