Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: Osteoporos Int. 2010 Oct 9;22(3):967–982. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1424-x

Table 4.

Base-case analysis for incremental cost-effectiveness (cost per life year and QALY gained)

Denosumab vs. no treatment Denosumab vs. generic alendronate Denosumab vs. risedronate Denosumab vs. strontium ranelate
Costs/patient (€)
 Morbidity cost difference −1,762 −937 −1,132 −1,339
 Treatment cost differencea 1,868 1,530 1,055 939
 Cost in added life years 936 562 643 658
 Total cost difference 1,042 1,155 565 258
Avoided fractures during 10 years/1,000 patients
 Hip fractures −28 −14 −19 −23
 Vertebral fractures −54 −36 −39 −37
 NNT to avoid one hip fracture 36 71 54 44
 NNT to avoid one vertebral fracture 18 28 26 27
QALYs and life years per patient
 Life years gained (undiscounted) 0.0582 0.0349 0.0400 0.0409
 Life years gained (discounted) 0.0401 0.0240 0.0274 0.0281
 QALYs gained 0.0721 0.0426 0.0490 0.0514
Cost/life year gained 25,980 48,226 20,592 9,161
Cost per QALY gained (excluding CIALY) 1,476 13,907 Cost saving Cost saving
Cost per QALY gained 14,458 27,090 11,545 5,015

Women aged 71 years with a T-score at or below −2.5 SD and 34% prevalence of prior vertebral fracture NNT number needed to treat

a

Including monitoring costs