Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: Osteoporos Int. 2010 Oct 9;22(3):967–982. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1424-x

Table 5.

Other sensitivity analyses (€/QALY)

Scenario Denosumab vs. no treatment Denosumab vs. generic alendronate Denosumab vs. risedronate Denosumab vs. strontium ranelate
Base casea 14,458 27,090 11,545 5,015
Discount rates (5%) 15,453 29,617 11,979 4,923
Discount rates (0%) 13,638 24,135 11,501 5,707
1 year DAPS persistence 15,937 35,114 12,983 4,313
Perfect persistence for all treatments 11,936 66,604 10,750 Cost saving
Denosumab maximum offset time 2 years 19,937 40,531 19,547 11,237
All treatments maximum offset time 2 years 19,937 34,920 16,953 9,896
10-year modeling horizon 13,833 32,993 8,752 10
GIAEsb for alendronate/risedronate 26,595 11236
Disutility from fractures decreased by 10% 16,362 30,633 13,057 5,685
20% of excess mortality attributable to fractures 10,951 25,340 7,587 228
10 year treatment duration 14,375 28,145 11,532 4,569
Mortality after hip and vertebral fractures 3 years 11,675 25,504 8,347 1,276
Mortality after hip and vertebral fractures 5 years 13,459 26,485 10,387 3,675
a

The base case assumed discount rates of 3%, improved persistence for 3-years, maximum offset time of 5 years for all treatments, life-time horizon, no adverse events for any treatment, 5-year maximum treatment duration, 8 years of increased post-fracture mortality after hip and vertebral fractures

b

Gastrointestinal adverse events