Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Nov 30;31(4):718–724. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2739

Table 4.

Relationship Between per-0.10 Increment of the FI and Risk of Onset of Incident Falls and Deatha

Outcomes Year 2 post-baseline
Year 3 post-baseline
OR (95% CI) p Value OR (95% CI) p Value
Changed valuesb
 Falls
  Age (years) 1.05 (0.75–1.46) 0.79 1.02 (0.87–1.19) 0.82
  FI 1.10 (0.97–1.25) 0.15 1.72 (0.96–3.06) 0.34
Death
 Age (years) 1.23 (0.98–1.56) 0.081 0.74 (0.33–1.64) 0.45
 FI 1.84 (1.34–2.53) <0.001 1.33 (0.87–2.03) 0.20
Absolute measures from previous yearc
 Falls
  Age (years) 1.00 (0.99–1.02) 0.85 1.01 (1.00–1.03) 0.13
  FI 1.18 (1.10–1.27) <0.001 1.12 (1.02–1.22) 0.018
Death
 Age (years) 1.06 (1.03–1.10) <0.001 1.05 (1.02–1.09) 0.004
 FI 1.58 (1.33–1.89) <0.001 1.24 (1.07–1.46) 0.006

FI = frailty index; OR = odds ratio; CI= confidence interval.

a

Incident falls: n = 483 (21.33%) for year 2 post-baseline; n = 288 (17.04%) for year 3 post-baseline. Incident death: n = 43 (1.09%) for year 2 post-baseline; n = 25 (0.64%) for year 3 post-baseline.

b

For year 2, changed values were from year 1 minus baseline, denoted as FI(year 1– baseline); for year 3, changed values were from year 2 minus year 1, denoted as FI(year 2 – year 1).

c

For year 2, information was from year 1; for year 3, information was from year 2.