Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: Bone. 2015 Apr 25;77:107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.04.028

Table 2.

Comparison of prediction and model performances between FI and FRAX in 3-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture.

Model Major osteoporotic fracturea (n = 149)
HR (95% CI), p-value C-index p-Value for goodness of fit test
Models with per-0.01 increment
FRAX 1.03 (1.02–1.05), <0.001 0.62 0.15
FIb 1.02 (1.01–1.04), <0.001 0.61 0.85
Models with categorized groups
FRAXc
 Medium-risk N/Ae N/Ae
  <365 days 1.33 (0.75–2.38), 0.34
  365–550 days 1.28 (0.62–2.65), 0.51
  >550 days 2.00 (1.09–3.68), 0.026
 High-risk
  <365 days 1.73 (0.78–3.87), 0.18
  365–550 days 1.66 (0.80–3.44), 0.17
  >550 days 2.61 (1.48–4.58), 0.001
FIb,d
 Medium-risk 1.23 (0.82–1.84), 0.31 0.61 0.22
  <365 days 1.10 (0.69–1.75), 0.70
  365–550 days 1.47 (0.81–2.67), 0.21
  >550 days 1.84 (1.16–2.93), 0.009
 High-risk 2.04 (1.36–3.07), 0.001
  <365 days 1.62 (0.85–3.09), 0.15
  365–550 days 1.27 (0.81–2.01), 0.30
  >550 days 2.14 (1.20–3.82), 0.006

HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; FRAX: fracture risk assessment tool; FI: frailty index.

a

Hip, upper arm or shoulder, spine, or wrist.

b

Adjusted for age.

c

Low-risk group taken as reference group; the cut-points were 10% and 20% for major osteoporotic fracture; comparisons of high-risk versus low-risk and medium-risk versus low-risk group were within the same follow-up duration strata.

d

Low-risk group taken as reference group; the cut-points were 0.20 and 0.35 for major osteoporotic fracture; comparisons of high-risk versus low-risk and medium-risk versus low-risk group were within the same follow-up duration strata.

e

No estimation of c index or goodness of fit test conducted due to time-varying variable included in the model.