Table 2.
Studya | SENS(95% CI) | SPEC(95% CI) | PPV(95% CI) | NPV(95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Papaioannou [35] | 91 (77, 97) | 49 (45, 53) | 9.4 (7, 13) | 99 (97, 100) |
Vassallo [31] | 68 (47, 84) | 66 (57, 74) | 28 (18, 42) | 91 (83, 96) |
Chiari [38] | 19 (11, 32) | 88 (85, 89) | 6 (4, 12) | 96 (95, 97) |
Oliver [30] (Cohort 1)b | 93.0 (84., 98) | 88 (36, 91.0) | 62 (52, 71) | 98 (96, 99) |
Oliver [30] (Cohort 2)b | 55 (43, 66) | 88 (84, 90) | 48 (38, 60) | 90 (86, 93) |
Whereas more than one cut-off score is reported in the original paper, cut-off with best predictive accuracy is reported in this table;
Oliver reported predictive validity analysis for falls as individual events rather than patients who fell (fallers).