Table 2.
Summary of predictive validity analyses for studies included in the systematic review but excluded from pooling for meta-analysis, as not geriatric rehabilitation settings
| Studya | SENS(95% CI) | SPEC(95% CI) | PPV(95% CI) | NPV(95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Papaioannou [35] | 91 (77, 97) | 49 (45, 53) | 9.4 (7, 13) | 99 (97, 100) |
| Vassallo [31] | 68 (47, 84) | 66 (57, 74) | 28 (18, 42) | 91 (83, 96) |
| Chiari [38] | 19 (11, 32) | 88 (85, 89) | 6 (4, 12) | 96 (95, 97) |
| Oliver [30] (Cohort 1)b | 93.0 (84., 98) | 88 (36, 91.0) | 62 (52, 71) | 98 (96, 99) |
| Oliver [30] (Cohort 2)b | 55 (43, 66) | 88 (84, 90) | 48 (38, 60) | 90 (86, 93) |
a
Whereas more than one cut-off score is reported in the original paper, cut-off with best predictive accuracy is reported in this table;
b
Oliver reported predictive validity analysis for falls as individual events rather than patients who fell (fallers).