Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 May 10:S0025-6196(16)00125-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.02.012

TABLE 2.

Published Surrogate Correlation Studies for Traditional Approvals Based on a Surrogate

Tumor type Approved drug (year) Basis of traditional approval Studies assessed level 2 surrogacy Studies assessed level 1 surrogacy
Basal cell carcinoma Vismodegib (2012) ORR - -

Breast cancer Pertuzumab (2012) PFS Ciccarese et al,26 2007 (abstract): rOS vs DFS=0.77
Matsubara et al,27 2011: HROS vs PFS=0.93, P=.31
Hackshaw et al,28 2005: rHR OS vs TTP=0.75
Burzykowski et al,29 2008: rHR OS vs PFS=0.48
Miksad et al,30 2008: rHR OS vs PFS=0.7 for anthracyclines
Miksad et al,30 2008: rHR OS vs PFS=0.59 for taxanes
Ng et al,31 2008: rdiff OS vs DFS=0.62
Sherrill et al,32 2008: rHR OS vs TTP=0.55
Beauchemin et al,33 2014: rdiff OS vs PFS/TTP=0.43

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia Idelalisib (2014)
Ofatumumab (2014)
Obinutuzumab (2013)
PFS - -

Chronic myeloid leukemia Bosutinib (2012) MCyR
Complete hematology response
Overall hematologic response
Rosti et al,21 2003: rOS vs MCyR=0.66
Oriana et al,20 2013: P=.02 at 5 y, CCyR vs no CCyR (no report on coefficient)
Jain et al,19 2013: P=.01 at 3 y, CCyR vs no CCyR
-

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma Romidepsin (2009) ORR - -

Differentiated thyroid cancer Sorafenib (2013) PFS - -

Follicular lymphoma Rituximab (2011) PFS - -

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor Lanreotide (2014)
Sunitinib (2011) for pancreatic NET
Everolimus (2011) for pancreatic NET
PFS - Singh et al,45 2014: rHR OS vs PFS/TTP=0.17

Giant cell tumor Denosumab (2013) ORR and DOR - -

Mantle cell lymphoma Lenalidomide (2013) ORR and DOR - -

Medullary thyroid carcinoma Cabozantinib (2012)
Vandetenib (2011)
PFS - -

Melanoma Trametinib (2013)
Dabrafenib (2013)
Peginterferon-alpha 2b (2013)
PFS - Flaherty et al,46 2014: rHR OS vs PFS=0.89

Non-small cell lung cancer Nab paclitaxel (2012) ORR Splinter,34 1991: rOS vs ORR=0.57
Paesmans et al,35 1997: rOS vs ORR=2.20, P<.0001
Sekine et al,36 1998: rOS vs ORR=0.504
Bruzzi et al,37 2007 (abstract): OS HRresponse vs no response=0.50, P<.001
Tsujino et al,38 2009: rOS vs ORR=0.258
Mandrekar et al,39 2010: OS HRresponse vs no response=0.66, P=.009
Li et al,40 2012: rOS vs ORR=0.91
Blumenthal et al,41 2015: rHR OS vs ORR=0.3
Johnson et al,42 2006: rdiff OS vs ORR=0.4
Crizotinib (2014)
Afatinib (2014)
Erlotinib (2013)
PFS Hayashi et al,47 2012: rPFS vs OS=0.43
Sekine et al,48 1999: rPFS vs OS=0.80
Blumenthal et al,41 2015: rHR OS vs PFS=0.28
Suzuki et al,49 2014: rHR OS vs PFS=0.41
Hayashi et al,50 2013: rdiff OS vs PFS=0.29
Hotta et al,51 2013: rHR OS vs PFS=0.37
Mauguen et al,52 2013: rHR OS vs DFS=0.96
Hotta et al,53 2009: rOS ratio vs TTP ratio=0.57

Ovarian cancer Olaparib (2014) ORR Rose et al,44 2010: rOS vs ORR=0.56 -

Ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer Bevacizumab (2014) PFS Rose et al,44 2010: rOS vs PFS=0.66 -

Renal cell carcinoma Axitinib (2012)
Pazopanib (2009)
Bevacizumab (2009)
Everolimus (2009)
PFS Halabi et al,54 2014: HROS vs progression at 6 mo=2.8, P<.0001
Heng et al,55 2011: rOS vs PFS=0.66
Bria et al,56 2015: r12 mo OS vs 3 mo PFS=0.82, r12 mo OS vs 6 mo PFS=0.85
Johnson et al,57 2015: rdiff OS vs PFS=0.7
Petrelli and Barni,58 2013: rdiff OS vs PFS=0.36
Delea et al,59 2012: rdiff OS vs PFS/TTP=0.53
rHR OS vs PFS/TTP=0.79

Soft-tissue sarcoma Pazopanib (2012) PFS Penel et al,43 2013: rOS vs PFS=0.4 -

CCyR =complete cytogenetic response; CRi =complete response with incomplete blood count recovery; DFS =disease-free survival; DOR =duration of response; HR =hazard ratio; MaHR =major hematologic response; MCyR =major cytogenetic response; MMR =major molecular response; MRD =minimal residual disease; NET =neuroendrocine tumor; ORR =objective response rate, OS =overall survival; pCR =pathologic complete response; PFS =progression-free survival; TTP =time to progression.