Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 27;291(46):24065–24075. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.756965

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9.

Structural explanation for why the CTD does not bind NAD+. A, a model of NAD+ from the GSALDH domain has been docked to the CTD in the canonical position for Rossmann dinucleotide-binding domains. Residues predicted to clash NAD+ are in cyan. B, the surface of the CTD where NAD+ would be expected to bind. NAD+ is docked into the canonical position for Rossmann dinucleotide-binding domains. Note the absence of a well defined pocket for NAD+. C, the surface of the bona fide NAD+-binding site of the Rossmann 1 domain of SmPutA. Note the presence of a pocket that is complementary in shape to the active conformation of NAD+.