Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec;106(12):2219–2226. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303471

TABLE 2—

Age-Adjusted Cardiovascular Disease Incidence Rates According to Levels of Neighborhood Characteristics for Women and Men: Jackson Heart Study; Jackson, MS; 2000–2011

Women (n = 2652)
Men (n = 1444)
Variable No. of Events Incidence/1000 PY (95% CI) Ptrend No. of Events Incidence/1000 PY (95% CI) Ptrend
Overall 144 4.4 (3.6, 5.4) 88 5.6 (4.4, 7.1)
Neighborhood disadvantage .006 .27
 High 78 5.5 (4.1, 7.4) 38 7.1 (4.9, 10.2)
 Medium 47 4.0 (3.1, 5.1) 28 6.0 (4.7, 7.8)
 Low 19 2.9 (2.0, 4.2) 22 5.2 (3.5, 7.6)
Social cohesion .20 .96
 Low 55 4.7 (3.5, 6.4) 30 6.1 (4.2, 8.8)
 Medium 57 4.1 (3.3, 5.2) 25 6.0 (4.7, 7.8)
 High 32 3.6 (2.6, 5.0) 33 6.0 (4.2, 8.5)
Violence .026 .35
 High 59 5.2 (3.9, 7.0) 32 6.9 (4.7, 9.9)
 Medium 67 4.1 (3.2, 5.2) 33 6.1 (4.7, 7.8)
 Low 18 3.2 (2.2, 4.5) 23 5.3 (3.7, 7.7)
Disorder .002 .75
 High 76 5.7 (4.2, 7.5) 32 6.3 (4.3, 9.1)
 Medium 52 3.9 (3.1, 5.0) 33 6.0 (4.7, 7.8)
 Low 16 2.7 (1.9, 4.0) 23 5.8 (4.0, 8.3)

Note. CI = confidence interval; PY = person-years. Poisson regression was used to estimate gender-specific, age-adjusted incidence rates (sum of events/PY) overall and according to levels of neighborhood characteristics. Cardiovascular disease events included definite or probable fatal or nonfatal coronary heart disease and stroke events. PY were calculated as time to first cardiovascular disease event. The neighborhood disadvantage score was constructed by summing z-scores for eight 2000 US Census indicators. Neighborhood social cohesion, violence, and disorder were assessed via validated scales during a follow-up phone interview approximately 3 years after the baseline examination.