Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec;106(12):2219–2226. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303471

TABLE 3—

Adjusted Hazard Ratios for Cardiovascular Disease Incidence Corresponding to a 1-Standard Deviation Increase in Neighborhood Disadvantage, Social Cohesion, Neighborhood Violence, and Neighborhood Disorder: Jackson Heart Study; Jackson, MS; 2000–2011

Women (n = 2652)
Men (n = 1444)
Variable Model 1, HR (95% CI) Model 2, HR (95% CI) Model 3, HR (95% CI) Model 1, HR (95% CI) Model 2, HR (95% CI) Model 3, HR (95% CI)
Disadvantage 1.33 (1.12, 1.58) 1.25 (1.05, 1.49) 1.23 (1.04, 1.45) 1.10 (0.86, 1.40) 1.08 (0.82, 1.41) 1.03 (0.79, 1.36)
Social cohesion 1.11 (0.97, 1.26) 1.04 (0.90, 1.20) 1.04 (0.91, 1.19) 0.92 (0.76, 1.12) 0.88 (0.70, 1.10) 0.87 (0.69, 1.09)
Violence 1.18 (1.04, 1.34) 1.13 (1.00, 1.28) 1.14 (1.01, 1.29) 1.02 (0.82, 1.26) 0.98 (0.77, 1.25) 0.99 (0.77, 1.27)
Disorder 1.28 (1.10, 1.49) 1.20 (1.02, 1.40) 1.18 (1.01, 1.40) 0.99 (0.80, 1.23) 0.95 (0.74, 1.21) 0.93 (0.72, 1.20)

Note. CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio. Model 1 adjusts for age; model 2 further adjusts for baseline family income and educational attainment; model 3 further adjusts for baseline cardiovascular risk factors (physical activity, dietary fat consumption, smoking status, alcohol consumption, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, body mass index, hypertension status, and diabetes status).