TABLE 3—
Women (n = 2652) |
Men (n = 1444) |
|||||
Variable | Model 1, HR (95% CI) | Model 2, HR (95% CI) | Model 3, HR (95% CI) | Model 1, HR (95% CI) | Model 2, HR (95% CI) | Model 3, HR (95% CI) |
Disadvantage | 1.33 (1.12, 1.58) | 1.25 (1.05, 1.49) | 1.23 (1.04, 1.45) | 1.10 (0.86, 1.40) | 1.08 (0.82, 1.41) | 1.03 (0.79, 1.36) |
Social cohesion | 1.11 (0.97, 1.26) | 1.04 (0.90, 1.20) | 1.04 (0.91, 1.19) | 0.92 (0.76, 1.12) | 0.88 (0.70, 1.10) | 0.87 (0.69, 1.09) |
Violence | 1.18 (1.04, 1.34) | 1.13 (1.00, 1.28) | 1.14 (1.01, 1.29) | 1.02 (0.82, 1.26) | 0.98 (0.77, 1.25) | 0.99 (0.77, 1.27) |
Disorder | 1.28 (1.10, 1.49) | 1.20 (1.02, 1.40) | 1.18 (1.01, 1.40) | 0.99 (0.80, 1.23) | 0.95 (0.74, 1.21) | 0.93 (0.72, 1.20) |
Note. CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio. Model 1 adjusts for age; model 2 further adjusts for baseline family income and educational attainment; model 3 further adjusts for baseline cardiovascular risk factors (physical activity, dietary fat consumption, smoking status, alcohol consumption, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, body mass index, hypertension status, and diabetes status).