Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 10;7(6):1066–1079. doi: 10.3945/an.115.011452

TABLE 1.

Main characteristics of the 18 studies included in this study regarding refugees’ food intake1

Author, year (ref) Study design2 Sampling method Time of data collection Region of origin or race Current US living area Sample size Sex Age, y SES Time lived in or acculturation to the United States
Dharod, 2015 (15) II, FFQ Snowball Jun 2010 to Jul 2011 Montagnard (Vietnam) North Carolina 42 F Mean: 40 y No formal education: 60%; household income ≤$500/mo: 39%; no health insurance: 66%; SNAP: 66% Poor English proficiency: 88%
Anderson et al., 2014 (16) SQ via FG, FFQ Purposive3, snowball Jul–Oct 2002 Sudan Atlanta, GA 49 (households) M, F Child ≤3 y in each house; others: 68.9% from 21 to 30 y Food insecurity: 37%; reported child hunger: 12% Lived in the United States <4 y: 89.8%
Haley et al., 2014 (17) FG, II Snowball NA Burma Worcester, MA 18 M, F 20–40 y NA NA
Peterman et al., 2013 (18) FG, SQ Random Apr–May 2007 (FG);Sep–Nov 2007, Apr–Jun 2008 (SQ) Cambodia Lowell, MA 11 (FG); 160 (SQ) F 30–65 y (FG); 35–60 y (SQ) ≤1 y of education: 24%; high school: 21%; employed: 58%; above the federal poverty rate: 15%; food security rate: 24%; current FSP: 30% Lived in the United States: 19.3 ± 7.04 y; acculturation score5: 2.1 ± 0.7
Dharod et al., 2013 (19) SQ via II, FFQ Snowball Oct 2006 to Dec 2007 Somalia Lewiston, ME 195 F Mean: 33.6 y No formal education: 49%; mean household income<$1000/mo; food insecurity rate: 67%; current SNAP: 92%; current WIC: 75% Poor English proficiency: 72%
CDC, 2011 (20) and Cuffe et al., 2014 (21) Intervention study Random Dec 2007 to Nov 2008; Jun 2009 to Jan 2011; Sept 2010 to Jan 2011; NA Bhutan Minnesota, Utah, and Texas 99; 141; 326; 49 M, F 15–50 y; 17–65 y NA
Peterman et al., 2011 (22) FG, SQ, 24-h dietary recall Random 2007–2008 Cambodia Lowell, MA 11 (FG); 150 (SQ) F 35–60 y Education ≤1 y: 23%; some education: 54%; high school: 23% Acculturation score5: 2.1 ± 0.7; lived in the United States: 18.7 ± 7.7 y
Vue et al., 2011 (23) FG Purposive3 NA Hmong Northern California 15 F 19–37 y Living in low-income community All speak English well
Rondinelli et al., 2011 (24) FG, II Random Dec 2006 to Mar 2007 Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Iran, Iraq, Russia, Somalia, Sudan, Vietnam San Diego County, CA 16 (refugees resettled in the United States; other nonrefugees were included) M, F 37–54 y <High school: 37%, no college degree Lived in the United States: 3.0 y (interquartile: 1.3–4.0 y)
Peterman et al., 2010 (25) FG, SQ Random End of 2010 Cambodia Lowell, MA 11 (FG); 133 (SQ) F 35–60 y <High school: 82% Acculturation score5: 2
Hadley et al., 2010 (26) FG, SQ Snowball through local resettlement agency 2006 Sierra Leone, Liberia, Ghana, Somalia, Togo, Russia (Meskhetian Turk) Midwest of the United States 281 M, F 18–84 y ≥1 y of education: 79%; currently employed: 61%; household income <$500/mo: 25%; current FSP: 53% Able to read English: 56%; lived in the United States: 8.0 ± 2.3 y
Patil et al., 2009 (27) FG, SQ Purposive3 NA Mixed6 NA 157 F 18–74 y ≥High school education: 50%; household income <$1000/mo: 48%; current FSP: 50%; current WIC: 47%; currently employed: 59%
Willis and Buck, 2007 (28) II, SQ, 3-d 24-h food diary Purposive3 Jun 2005 to Feb 2006 Sudan (Dinka or Nuer) NA 31 (II); 29 (SQ) M, F 20–49 y Some college and above: 42%; unemployed: 35% Lived in the United States <5 y: 55%
Hadley and Sellen, 2006 (29) SQ, FG Snowball NA Liberia Northeastern United States 33 F Mean: 35.9 y ≥High school: 51%; <$1000/mo: 60%; food insecurity rate: 85%; child hunger: 42%; FSP: 51%; WIC: 54%; currently employed: 48% All subjects had lived in the United States <5 y
Barnes and Almasy, 2005 (30) II Snowball NA Bosnia, Cuba, Iran NA 31 M, F 19–71 y High school: 65%; some college: 23%; employed in low-paying job: 58% Fluent English: none; lived in the United States: 2.8 y (3 mo to 5 y)
Rairdan and Higgs, 1992 (31) II NA NA Hmong Spokane, WA 13 (households) M, F NA NA NA
Story and Harris, 1989 (32) II (including itemized food consumption) Randomly selected from a school list June 1984 Hmong, Cambodia NA 60 M, F 28–69 y Husbands employed: 23%; wives employed: 17%; FSP: 73%; WIC: 42% All subjects had lived in the United States <5 y
Story and Harris, 1988 (33) SQ (including itemized food consumption) Randomly selected from Southeast Asian refugee high school students Fall 1985 Vietnam, Hmong, Cambodia Minneapolis, MN 207 M, F High-school age; grades 10–12 No father at home: 56.5%; no mother at home: 34.5%; youth employed part time: 8% All subjects had lived in the United States <5 y
1

FFQ, Food Frequency Questionnaire; FG, focus group interview; FSP, food stamp program; II, individual interview; NA, not available; ref, reference; SES, socioeconomic status; SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; SQ, survey questionnaire; WIC, Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children.

2

Except for one intervention study (20, 21), all were cross-sectional studies.

3

Purposive sampling: a nonrepresentative subset of some larger population under very specific characteristics or purpose.

4

Mean ± SD (all such values).

5

Acculturation was measured by using a scale that focuses on cultural orientation and values rather than behaviors or proxies for acculturation. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 representing identifying only with natives and 5 representing identifying only with Americans (10).

6

Liberia, Ivory Coast, Burundi, Ethopia, Somalia, Kenya, Russia (Meskhetian Turk) (FG); Liberia, Somalia, Russia (Meskhetian Turk) (SQ).