Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 10;7(6):994–1004. doi: 10.3945/an.116.013052

TABLE 11.

Comparing GRADE quality of evidence with meta-evidence judgment based on the NutriGrade1

Comparison outcome reference Study design GRADE quality of evidence NutriGrade Meta-evidence judgment
Low saturated fat compared with usual diet MA of RCTs Moderate 7.3 Moderate
 Outcome: all-cause mortality
 (6)
Paleolithic diet MA of RCTs Moderate 5.75 Low
 Outcome: waist circumference
 (46)
High- vs. low-protein diet MA of RCTs Moderate 4.05 Low
 Outcome: weight loss
 (47)
High- vs. low-fat diet MA of RCTs Moderate 6.8 Moderate
 Outcome: TGs
 (48)
Low-carbohydrate vs. balanced diet MA of RCTs Moderate 5.35 Low
 Diastolic blood pressure
 (49)
High- vs. low-saturated fat MA of cohort studies Very low 4.5 Low
 Outcome: all-cause mortality
 (5)
High vs. low coffee intake MA of cohort studies Low 7.3 Moderate
 Outcome: endometrial cancer
 (50)
High vs. low sodium intake MA of cohort studies Very low 5.55 Low
 Outcome: stroke
 (51)
High vs. low intake of sugar-sweetened beverages in children MA of cohort studies Low 4.5 Low
 Outcome: adiposity
 (52)
High vs. low potassium intake MA of cohort studies Low 5.9 Low
 Outcome: stroke
 (53)
1

GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; MA, meta-analysis; RCT, randomized controlled trial.