Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 11;6:36744. doi: 10.1038/srep36744

Table 1. Qualitative appraisal of different specimen preparation protocols with effects on the degree of preservation quality (pres.) and contrasting (cont.) of selected subcellular structures visible at the acquired magnification.

Cellular structures SCF
GOT
TAMOI
ROUM
NCMIR
Pres. Cont. Pres. Cont. Pres. Cont. Pres. Cont. Pres. Cont.
Plasma membrane + + + + ++ ++ ++ ++ +++ +++
Rough endoplasmic reticulum + + + + +++ ++ +++ +++
Mitochondria ± ± + + ++ ++ +++ +++
Lipid droplets ++ + + ++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ ++
Glycogen nv nv nv nv + + +++ ++ +++ +++
Nuclear membrane + ± + + ++ + +++ ++ +++ +++
Chromatin ++ ± ++ ± +++ ++ +++ +++ +++ +++
Nucleoli ++ + + + ++ + +++ + +++ +++

Criteria used in assessing fixation quality based on morphology: (nv) not visible; (−) poor; (±) satisfactory; (+) good; (++) very good; (+++) excellent.

SCF, standard chemical fixation; GOT, glutaraldehyde-osmium tetroxide-tannic acid; TAMOI, tannic acid mediated osmium impregnation; ROUM, reduced osmium and en bloc uranyl acetate method; NCMIR, National Centre for Microscopy and Imaging Research.