Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2016 Mar 30;173:160–164.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.03.021

Table 2.

Comparison of subjects with and without steatosis(n=69)

Characteristic No steatosis (n=46) Steatosis (n=23) P
Age, years 15.9 ± 2.9 16.3 ± 3.0 0.55
Female sex 18 (39%) 8 (35%) 0.73
Anthropometry
 BMI (kg/m2) 20.9 (18.5, 23.3) 28.7 (25.4, 36.4) <0.0001
 BMI percentile (among 63 subjects <20y) 60.8 (20.9, 86.8) 96.4 (84.4, 98.7) <0.0001
 BMI z-score (among 63 subjects <20y) 0.28 (−0.81, 1.12) 1.79 (1.01, 2.22) <0.0001
Liver disease diagnosis <0.0001
 Autoimmune hepatitis (includes drug-induced + PSC overlap) 18 (39) 0 (0)
 NAFLD (n=10 NASH) 0 (0) 14 (61)
 Viral hepatitis 9 (20) 4 (17)
 Wilson’s disease/Alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency 2 (4) 1 (4)
 Cellular rejection 1 (2) 0 (0)
 Cholestasis (includes PFIC) 0 (0) 1 (4)
 Other1 16 (35) 3 (13)
Blood tests nearest to time of CAP
 ALT, U/L (n=62) 63 (41, 151) 129 (86, 262) 0.07
 AST, U/L (n=56) 41 (33, 80) 66 (43, 129) 0.13
 GGTP, U/L (n=49) 84 (27, 161) 83 (56, 118) 0.57
1

7 with PSC, 5 with chronic hepatitis of unknown etiology, 2 with lysosomalacid lipase deficiency, 1 routine liver biopsy at the time of bariatric surgery, 1 with diabetes associated glycogenic hepatopathy, 1 with veno-occlusive disease, 1 with nodular regenerative hyperplasia, and 1 with severe combined immunodeficiency s/p stem cell transplant