Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 20;10(5):369–376. doi: 10.1080/19336896.2016.1228507

TABLE 1.

Comparison of studies on iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (iCJD) and Aβ deposition. AD: Alzheimer disease; GH: growth hormone; NA: not addressed in the study; Nr: number. * Indicates that these cases were included in Study 2 also.

Study
Study 1
Study 2
Study 3
Study 4
Type of iCJD Pituitary-derived GH Dura mater Dura mater Dura mater
Number of iCJD cases examined 8 7 2* 16
Nr. of iCJD with parenchymal Aβ deposits 4 + 2 focal 5 2* 13
Distinct morphology or distribution of parenchymal Aβ NA NA Yes Subpial accumulation emphasized. Morphology of parenchymal plaques not commented.
Nr. of iCJD with CAA 3 + 1 focal 5 2* 11
Cadaveric tissue examined No No Yes No
Non-cadaveric tissue examined Yes: pituitary (55 samples) No Yes: dura mater (84 samples) No
AD related tau pathology No No No Yes - details not provided
Genetic aspects APOE + AD genes NA APOE + AD genes APOE
Statistical difference when compared to sCJD Yes Yes NA Yes
Age of iCJD cases with parenchymal Aβ 4th decade to 51 28–63 28, 33 35–81
Age of iCJD cases with CAA 5th decade to 51 28–63 28, 33 35–81
Age of cases < 40 y with parenchymal Aβ deposits 36 (focal) 28, 33 28, 33 35, 39
Age of cases < 40 y with CAA 28, 33 28, 33 35, 39
Clinical phenotype CJD CJD CJD CJD
Reference 25 27 28 29