Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 11;13:116. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0443-1

Table 2.

Sample characteristics of participants participating in vitamin D intervention study (n = 90)

Variable Intervention (n = 41) % (n) Control (n = 49) % (n) Total (n = 90) % (n)
Sex
 Male 34 % (14) 49 % (24) 42 % (38)
 Female 66 % (27) 51 % (25) 58 % (52)
Age
 18-19 24 % (10) 8.1 % (4) 16 % (14)
 20-21 20 % (8) 39 % (19) 30 % (27)
 22-23 32 % (13) 22 % (11) 27 % (24)
 24-25 24 % (10) 31 % (15) 28 % (25)
Ethnicity
 White/Caucasian 46 % (19) 55 % (27) 51 % (46)
 Asian, South Asian, Southeast Asian 17 % (7) 12 % (6) 14.5 % (13)
 European 7 % (3) 8 % (4) 8 % (7)
 Middle Eastern/Arab 7 % (3) 2 % (1) 4 % (4)
 African/Caribbean 7 % (3) 2 % (1) 4 % (4)
 Mixed ancestry 5 % (2) 6 % (3) 6 % (5)
 Other ethnicity (Aboriginal, Latin/Central American, Filipino, other) 10 % (4) 14 % (7) 12 % (11)
Highest level of education
 Some high school, or high school diploma 24 % (10) 10 % (5) 17 % (15)
 Some college, college diploma or professional certificate 12 % (5) 14 % (7) 13 % (12)
 Some university, or undergraduate degree 56 % (23) 63 % (31) 60 % (54)
 Some graduate school, or graduate degree 7 % (3) 12 % (6) 10 % (9)
Student status
 Currently a student 76 % (31) 61 % (30) 68 % (61)
BMI Classification
 Underweight (<18.5) 5 % (2) 6 % (3) 6 % (5)
 Normal weight (18.5-24.9) 70 %(28) 55 % (27) 62 % (55)
 Overweight (25.0-29.9) 20 % (8) 18 % (9) 19 % (17)
 Obese (≥30) 5 % (2) 20 % (10) 13 % (12)

Note: Student’s t-tests, χ 2 and ANOVAs indicated that the intervention and control group did not differ significantly on any of the following variables: gender, age, ethnicity, BMI, education level, employment, student status, supplement use, being employed in/studying health or nutrition, mean daily vitamin D intake or vitamin D3 concentrations (p > 0.05)