Skip to main content
. 2016 May 11;9(6):571–582. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0177-9

Table 4.

Summary of qualitative findings on the consult decision aid about alendronate as a treatment option for osteoporosis

Categories Comments/suggestions Response
Plain language Use plain language (e.g., harm–benefit ratio, contraindications, decline) Changed to simpler words
Alendronate ‘may’ … is unclear No change because this is accurate information
Remove ‘reasons to’ No change; features are not always benefits
Unsure if all will understand the information No change; for use in the consultation
Unclear what ‘best estimate’ means Added hyperlink to more information
Print size Add more space Added more space on internet version
Enlarge font for GRADE rating No change; information is for the clinician
Enlarge font overall No change; can modify font with browser settings
Make footer easier to read Changed color from gray to black font
Logical layout/format Need printable version Electronic and paper versions are planned
Improve designs for images Images to be improved during publishing
X in ‘decline the option’ is too strong X used for years in DAs; changed color/font of X to balance with other icons
Move ‘SURE test’ sooner No change; selecting kept after comparing options
Write from patient perspective (e.g. ‘I’ instead of ‘you’) No change; for use in the consultation
Clarity of information provided GRADE should be explained Added more details in a hyperlink
Unclear for ‘how much does this matter’ Added ‘to you’
Osteopenia does not equal osteoporosis Removed osteopenia as it was not necessary
Missing information Interaction with other drugs Added to list of other information to consider
Long-term use of medicine: benefits/harms, changes in side effects over time Added to list of other information to consider
Significance of harms and outcomes Added to list of other information to consider
Confidence intervals No change; not necessary for IPDAS criteria
Allergies Added to list of other information to consider
Cochrane and development of DA Added in user manual
More information on side effects Added to list of other information to consider
Full list of options Identified as a limitation
List of questions to discuss with doctor Added based on other information to consider
Too much information If they have osteoporosis, do you need description in Part I Required by IPDAS but not necessary to go through in a consult; added in manual on how to use it
Need for data entry: if they are doing it with the doctor, why write it down? For values clarification, it is better if the tool is interactive; made explicit in user manual
Remove references Required by IPDAS criteria; remained as hyperlink
Instructions Be more explicit on how to use the links Added to user manual and provided blue underlines
Provide instructions on using it Added in user manual

DA decision aid, IPDAS International Patient Decision Aid Standards