Table 2.
Farm #1 (Beef, conv.) |
Farm #2 (Dairy, org.) |
Farm #3 (Dairy, conv.) |
Farm #4 (Dairy, org.) |
Farm #5 (Beef, org.) |
Farm #6 (Dairy, org.) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group | IVM | CTL | IVM | CTL | IVM | CTL | IVM | CTL | IVM | CTL | IVM | CTL |
n | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 9 |
FEC Day 0 | 333 | 325 | 76 | 69 | 173 | 209 | 354 | 351 | 55 | 39 | 31 | 77 |
FEC Day 14 | 46 | 311 | 14 | 55 | 15 | 286 | 51 | 562 | 4 | 98 | 4 | 126 |
k |
0.7 (0.4–0.9) |
0.7 (0.1–1.0) |
0.3 (0.1–0.6) |
0.3 (0.2–0.5) |
1.0 (0.6–1.4) |
0.2 (0.1–0.4) |
||||||
With CTL |
FECR% |
[CI] |
FECR% |
[CI] |
FECR% |
[CI] |
FECR% |
[CI] |
FECR% |
[CI] |
FECR% |
[CI] |
WAAVPa | 85I | [67–95] | 75R | [27–92] | 95I | [56–99] | 91I | [74–97] | 96E | [92–99] | 97I | [65–99] |
Bayescountb |
87R |
[80–94] |
78R |
[61–92] |
93I |
[70–99] |
91I |
[73–99] |
96E |
[92–99] |
90I |
[52–99] |
No CTL |
FECR% |
[CI] |
FECR% |
[CI] |
FECR% |
[CI] |
FECR% |
[CI] |
FECR% |
[CI] |
FECR% |
[CI] |
WAAVPa | 86R | [66–94] | 82R | [47–94] | 92I | [30–99] | 86R | [67–94] | 94I | [87–97] | 83I | [−50–98] |
Bayescountb | 87R | [81–93] | 83R | [72–92] | 90I | [62–98] | 81R | [50–94] | 92I | [84–98] | 81I | [25–99] |
eggCountsc | 84R | [55–94] | 80R | [50–91] | 86I | [21–98] | 83R | [47–94] | 93I | [82–97] | 83I | [22–97] |
FEC = arithmetic mean faecal egg count; k = total post-treatment FEC aggregation estimate; FECR% = FEC reduction percentage; CI = 95% confidence interval.
EEfficacious; RReduced efficacy; IInconclusive; conv. = conventional; org. = organic.
Modified Bayescount (paired model with pooled between-animal and within-animal pre-treatment k).
eggCounts unpaired model (Torgerson et al., 2014).