Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2013 Feb 1;12(3):1289–1299. doi: 10.1021/pr3009435

Table 5.

A. Total proteins identifications from S12 synthetic and scrambled decoy peptide pull-downs for mid-log and stationary phase cross-over experiments
Pull-down Midlog
Total Protein ids
Stationary
Total Protein ids
Pull-down

Total Quantified Protein ids 185 112
S12 peptide specific 69 32
Decoy peptide specific 69 32

Crossover

Total Quantified Protein ids 119 113
S12 peptide specific 56 36
Decoy peptide specific 56 36
B. S12 specific protein identifications from S12 synthetic peptide pull-downs for mid-log and stationary phase crossover experiments
Acession Protein Name Pull-down Crossover

No.
peptides
Cl* log2 Ratio Ratio* No.
peptides
Cl* log2 Ratio Ratio
Mid-log phase
P0A6X3 Protein hfq 7 [4,5] 4.5 23 5 [2,3.2] 2.6 6
Stationary Phase
P0A6X3 Protein hfq 5 [1.8,2.8] 2.3 5 10 [2.1,3] 2.6 6
P21499 Rinbonuclease R 15 [2.9,3.8] 3.3 10 6 [1.3,2.8] 2 4
*

confidence interval widths for ProRata profile likelihood curves. A small CI width corresponds to a more accurate estimation of the ratio difference