Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 4;186(3):304–312. doi: 10.1111/cei.12865

Table 2.

Morphometric analysis of type III interferon (IFN) staining in minor salivary gland (MSG) tissues.

Type III IFNs CT SS SS‐I SS‐II SS‐III Significance
Mean value ± s.e. CT versus SS‐II* SS‐I versus SS‐II*
Total tissue IFN‐λ1/IL‐29 %Average positive stain/area 5·47 ± 2·18 4·33 ± 0·87 5·92 ± 1·72 4·10 ± 1·65 3·01 ± 0·97 n.s. n.s.
Average intensity/area 8·10 ± 3·28 6·30 ± 1·31 8·73 ± ±2·64 5·94 ± 2·42 4·32 ± 1·44 n.s. n.s.
IFN‐λ2/IL‐28A %Average positive stain/area 22·12 ± 4·14 31·32 ± 3·55 22·63 ± 6·06 40·23 ± 5·16 28·91 ± 6·54 P = 0·0125 P = 0·0376
Average intensity/area 33·32 ± 6·57 48·84 ± 5·79 34·82 ± 9·59 63·87 ± 8·77 44·26 ± 10·48 P = 0·0114 P = 0·0373
IFN‐λ3/IL‐28B %Average positive stain/area 0·16 ± 0·03 0·18 ± 0·02 0·19 ± 0·04 0·25 ± 0·04 0·13 ± 0·03 n.s. n.s.
Average intensity/area 24·29 ± 5·03 27·18 ± 3·33 27·96 ± 5·82 37·90 ± 7·05 19·17 ± 4·20 n.s. n.s.
Ductal epithelium IFN‐λ1/IL‐29 %Average positive stain/area 3·38 ± 2·52 2·25 ± 0·63 2·86 ± 1·16 1·93 ± 0·83 2·04 ± 1·41 n.s. n.s.
Average intensity/area 56·05 ± 7·43 67·19 ± 3·13 70·80 ± 4·50 64·28 ± 6·40 67·14 ± 4·95 n.s. n.s.
IFN‐λ2/IL‐28A %Average positive stain/area 33·88 ± 5·28 40·78 ± 4·52 32·26 ± 8·54 51·97 ± 6·13 35·77 ± 8·35 P = 0·0367 NS
Average intensity/area 96·71 ± 4·81 105·40 ± 4·96 95·15 ± 9·16 120·00 ± 6·67 98·04 ± 8·81 P = 0·0103 P = 0·0352
IFN‐λ3/IL‐28B %Average positive stain/area 43·86 ± 7·86 47·35 ± 4·33 48·82 ± 8·47 56·97 ± ±7·68 37·01 ± 5·86 n.s. n.s.
Average intensity/area 118·00 ± 6·85 121·30 ± 4·06 120·60 ± 7·63 129·40 ± 7·87 114·40 ± 5·45 n.s. n.s.

Sicca controls (CT) = sicca‐complaining non‐SS controls; Sjögren's syndrome (SS)‐I = patients with mild MSG infiltrates; SS‐II with intermediate and SS‐III with severe; n.s. = not significant; IL = interleukin; s.e. = standard error. *Statistical analysis revealed significant differences only between SS‐II (intermediate MSG inflammatory lesions) and CT, as well as SS‐I (mild lesions) and SS‐II.