Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 25;11(11):2085–2092. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03200316

Table 2.

Efficacy of warfarin in preventing ischemic strokes in CKD patients with atrial fibrillation

Study Country Design N Adjusted HR for Ischemic Stroke (95% CI) Comments
Banerjee et al., 2014 (9) France Retrospective 5912 (2982 with eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and 1550 on warfarin) 0.79 (0.44 to 1.42)a 1) Proteinuria data not available.
2) Small number of patients with eGFR≤30 ml/min per 1.73 m2.
Carrero et al., 2014 (8) Sweden Prospective 24317 (5292 on warfarin) eGFR>30–60 ml/min per 1.73 m2: 0.73 (0.66 to 0.80); 1) Postmyocardial infarct cohort so results may not be generalizable.
eGFR>15–30 ml/min per 1.73 m2: 0.84 (0.70 to 1.02); 2) GFR was determined by only one creatinine value. Potential for misclassification.
eGFR≤15 ml/min per 1.73 m2: 0.57 (0.37 to 0.86) 3) No INR data.
4) No data on duration of warfarin therapy or discontinuation rate.
5) Short follow-up 1 yr.
Lai et al., 2009 (10) United States Retrospective 399 (232 on warfarin) 0.71 (0.43 to 1.16)a 1) Unclear if incident atrial fibrillation population was studied.
2) Hemodialysis patients were grouped together with other CKD stages.
Olesen et al., 2012 (5) Denmark Retrospective 3587 (609 on warfarin) 0.84 (0.69 to 1.01) 1) CKD identified by ICD code.
2) GFR was determined by only one creatinine value. Potential for misclassification.
3) No INR data.
4) Unable to differentiate CKD stages.

HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95 % confidence interval; INR, international normalized ratio; ICD, International Classification of Diseases.

a

Hazard ratio taken from reference Dahal et al. (12).