Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 13;6(22):8028–8036. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2527

Table 4.

Results of multiple comparison tests applied to a Poisson‐distributed GLMM for “evening” Ceratopogonidae catches (17 sites). “Light position” nested within “site” was included as a random effect term and “light” as the only fixed effect term. Lights were compact fluorescent (CFL), filament (FIL), cool‐white light‐emitting diode (LEDC), and warm‐white light‐emitting diode (LEDW). * indicates a significant (< .05) difference

Estimate SE Z value p
FIL–CFL 1.7253 0.1438 12.000 <.001*
LEDC–CFL −2.0972 0.4005 −5.236 <.001*
LEDW–CFL −1.4781 0.3074 −4.809 <.001*
LEDC–FIL −3.8224 0.3821 −10.004 <.001*
LEDW–FIL −3.2034 0.2829 −11.322 <.001*
LEDW–LEDC 0.6190 0.4688 1.320 .520